Global citizenship and Gunamantra

= Why countries, states and towns/cities =

Country is formed to ensure that people of a particular land get undivided attention by leaders to ensure that all the people live properly and peacefully. As the country is bigger, it gets divided into states to get specific attention and understand the cultural diversity and promote it as well. Towns/cities and village are formed to ensure that people can interact with leaders or people who want to rule or serve the people of that place. The bottom line - it is structure to ensure sustainable living of only humans and ecology is given secondary importance after human needs are satisfied. Most of the people use these division to live in luxury and command respect in public places. They normally do not have 100% intention to only serve people, for which they get elected. Everyone has got their ego and this makes countries and states to be independent of each other. The leaders never want to bring one global village as they are incompetent to deal with people of huge diversity at one platform. Leaders have insecurity and greediness of other member countries exploiting them for their selfish growth of a specific region in which they live. This has been the human brain programming for several billion years and leaders want to rule. The word "Rule" gets polished into regional aspirations as a sugar-coated tablet for leaders to show their existence and how they are helping the people. Leaders are very good at gaining mileage, where people are exploited, they encash it very well.

Global thinking or Citizenship
Now the world is coming closer than ever, with technology. We can connect to any part of the world within seconds. Every country is dependent on each other for growth and prosperity. The concept of leader has never allowed people to think at an global level and think for everyone. Leaders never allow such concepts to grow or become popular, even when this will improve trade and commerce. They have their own insecurities and fear or selfishness or greediness to promote the place in which they live. Leader's who are selfish to keep their region first are actually doing more harm to everyone else. Citizens have no knowledge on how one global connected world can help everyone. Greediness of people at the lower levels have never encouraged the concept of one global village. Today, people are more worried about their family alone and they are least bothered if anyone else is living properly or not. Our cultural values and norms, do not allow our thinking levels to grow bigger or think better. Our brain/mind has been induced with historical fear and the fear is maintained by the existing leaders who are not talented to make people understand the benefits of a connected world. A community leader at the lowest level, will induce fear of other communities and vice versa by the other community leader to sustain their importance in their communities.

Leadership earns Money, perks, benefits and prestige The major reason why people are not able to connect is because of leaders. Leadership gives an opportunity to earn more than others, when it should be the reverse. The head of the country or state gets the max salary, perks and benefits apart from the prestige and his personnel ego boost are secondary. In reality, the leader, should lead a simplistic or to say idealistic lifestyle. The leader should not be at the leadership position to earn money or get all the benefits - their primary objective should be to connect and unite people. However, today people fight elections even at the smallest level not with an intention to serve for a smaller time period and grow others to replace them to do a better job. Leaders come to build careers and not to grow people or enable them. Leaders everywhere are known to build careers and are very selfish in nature - they never think about the pune or clerk or the security guard. They do not even think, what the other person is eating or living - The CEO of the org is least bothered, if some employee or cleaning staff is not getting proper food or not. This is not ingrained in our leadership model or behavior. We have always wanted our leaders to live in a life of glamour and luxury. Our brain is trained to see big people in glamour alone and this has been programmed as a mark of respect. Psychologically our definition, of the leader is that one who lives a glamorous life with luxury. It is not that a leader should not live in luxury, but what is the level of urgency and how much sensitive are they to bring immediate changes or take actions to ensure that everyone lives like them. If leaders live in a good state that is very good, but do they have the urgency to bring all the people at that level of living is very important.

Life is to enjoy and not to be depressed by seeing others in bad shape. However, the bigger meaning of life is live a kings life and enable others also to live like a king. Today, leaders are neither sensitive or want others to live a better life and there is no sense of urgency to bring growth to others standard of living.

No CEO or founder of any mnc or any org in the world has ever worked to reduce the variation of income and has asked the people to look after others. The leaders of the community and spiritual organizations also have not done it anywhere. Very few people would have achieved it and if they have, their names will not be popular in the media, and how they did it is also not known. As such org, never grow or prosper. Today, people grow only those org or entities whose leaders are selfish in nature and who do not think about reducing the variation of income. The variation of income of the founder of Google and the security guard or the toilet cleaner will be more than 100x. The person who cleans the dirt of everyone or someone who does the clerical job to enable others is not given, much importance. Leaders only give importance to people who are responsible to produce outcomes and they are known as people managers. These people manager, do not think about the last person because of which they have been able to achieve the result. All the leaders are good in doing formality gestures, getting some public attention and create an emotional outburst just before elections or when their post is at threat. Sustenance of good behaviour over longer period of time is not looked at anywhere in the world. The concept of demotion is not present anywhere in any org and its presence, can be felt only in entrepreneurship.

= International Org =

Democracy which is known as loktantra is not helping the overall growth and wellbeing of everyone. It has got multiple loopholes and is designed to just meet the selfish ends of few leaders or wealthy people. The development is just an byproduct after the goals of the leaders or wealthy people are achieved. This is true in any democracy or any part of the world. Common people, think that they have the power - however, it is pure illusion. Even in the best European countries where participative democracy is being heard also makes leaders live in luxury and in their own comfort zone. There is no urgency to solve the problems of people. All statements are made to attract people, only thing is people get to see some better person, in a while. Once, a person is in office for more than 6 months, their attributes change and people are not the urgent factor. The urgency and speeches only come during elections.